Home / Evidence

Evidence

A site arguing for provenance discipline should practice it. Every substantive claim published here traces to an artifact and a verification method, maintained in a claims ledger that is re-run against the live sources before publication. This page is the public index of that ledger.

Verification snapshot: 2026-08-02. Counts are live-database queries, not estimates; where a count could not be re-verified it was removed from the site rather than approximated. Known limitations are listed at the bottom — machloket-style, the weaknesses stay on the record.

Published papers & formal sources

ClaimArtifactHow to verify
"The Talmudic Epistemic Stack" proposes the Sugya Protocol; submitted to the Future of Life Foundation Epistemic Stack Competition, 2026 Full paper (PDF, CC-BY-4.0) · HTML edition Read it; the submission header is on page 1
Kal vachomer is formalized as matrix abduction Abraham, Gabbay & Schild, Studia Logica 92(3):281–364 (2009), DOI 10.1007/s11225-009-9202-5 Publisher record; worked Kidushin 5a–5b case study, §5
"Principles of Talmudic Logic" is the longest chapter (243 of 387 pages) of the Handbook of Philosophical Logic Vol. 18 Gabbay & Guenthner (eds.), Springer 2018, ISBN 978-3-319-97755-3, pp. 133–375 Publisher table of contents
The Talmudic Logic Project treats identity-through-change (Ship of Theseus) formally Gabbay, Schild & David, Logica Universalis 13(4):425–442 (2019), DOI 10.1007/s11787-019-00228-y — open access Example 6.2, pp. 432–433

The knowledge graph

ClaimValueHow verified
Total nodes / relationships157,143 / 215,426Live Cypher count(*), 2026-08-02
Cited teachings (100% carry reference + Hebrew + embedding)17,147Per-property count() — all three at 17,147/17,147
Scripture verses33,323Multi-label-safe label count
Citation edges (teaching → verse)15,910CITES_VERSE relationship count
Rabbi-to-Rabbi transmission edges / sages in the chain2,504 / 2,185Typed relationship counts, Rabbi→Rabbi only
Distinct source works behind the teachings108count(DISTINCT work)

The grounded-sages system

ClaimValueHow verified
Live systemrabbiakiva.openrabbi.comVisit it; ask for a source; try a fake verse
Champion eval baseline (n=12 probes)grounding 9.25 · accuracy 9.42 · citation-correctness 1.0 · all leak classes 0Eval harness output, judged by a 120B local model; gate passes all 13 checks
Gate rejects failing models4 of 5 candidate sage models rejectedFailing runs preserved in the eval record with their numbers
Fabrication reduction across model generations (n=261 held-out)fabrications 19 → 7 · token leaks 13 → 0, all quality dimensions improvedVersioned eval result files, four model generations compared
Negative result: bulk-embedding uncited nodes regressed groundingreverted; cited-anchors-only policy adoptedRecorded in the system's model documentation

Corpus & infrastructure

ClaimValueHow verified
Research-paper corpus → concept graph22,841 papers → 202,816 nodes / 336,609 edgesSQLite count(*) on the ingest database
File catalogue (5 machines)34,457,680 files · 234,591 PDF files · 10,232,735 pagesPostgres count(*); content-hash dedup not yet run, so counts are files, not uniques
Web estate90 tracked sites, 82 live or deployedSite-inventory database, status breakdown
Self-hosted database engines11 on one machine (6× Neo4j, 3× Postgres, ArangoDB, Qdrant)Container inventory

Known limitations — kept on the record